当前位置:首页 >  域名 >  正文 > 学警狙击

  交易 任务 SEO服务 站长团购 联盟

学警狙击

China, India hold 25th round of boundary talks; mechanism offers platform to stabilize ties, enhance strategic trust: expert_我的网站

千金女佣

一 |     

Drone image shows Philippine public vessels in waters near China's Huangyan Dao on July 23, 2026, for a supply mission for 12 Philippine
    Drone image shows Philippine public vessels in waters near China's Huangyan Dao on July 23, 2026, for a supply mission for 12 Philippine "octopus boats" in the area. During the cargo transfer operation, a large amount of fuel supplied by the Philippine vessels leaked. Photo: Courtesy of China Coast GuardMarking another attempt to smear China's legitimate actions over Huangyan Dao, a Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesperson claimed that China's possible "militarization" of the island could allow it to dominate much of the South China Sea and threaten freedom of navigation. Chinese experts said the claim deliberately hypes the so-called "China threat" rhetoric and turns the facts on their head, arguing that while Manila itself has been strengthening its military presence and fueling regional tensions, it appears to be demanding unrestricted access for its own vessels to waters around China's Huangyan Dao under the guise of "freedom of navigation."
PCG spokesperson Jay Tarriela claimed on Monday that Huangyan Dao is the last remaining point needed to complete China's "iron triangle" in the disputed waters, according to Manila Bulletin. 
Tarriela claimed during the National Maritime Council's (NMC) first semester press briefing in Manila that if connecting the Xisha Islands with Huangyan Dao, and Huangyan Dao with the Nansha Qundao, "it will allow China to dominate the entire maritime space of the South China Sea." He claimed that such pattern threatens freedom of navigation in a route carrying a large share of global trade.
In a social media post, Tarriela went further, alleging that if China "militarizes it (Huangyan Dao), the triangle closes and the danger stops being a Philippine problem." 
China has never carried out any so-called "militarization" of Huangyan Dao. The latest claim is another victimhood narrative fabricated by certain people in the Philippines to portray the country as being threatened and rally other countries behind its position as freedom of navigation has been a closely watched topic internationally, Chen Xiangmiao, director of the World Navy Research Center at the National Institute for South China Sea Studies, told the Global Times, noting that China's activities around Huangyan Dao mainly involve routine patrols and law enforcement actions by the China Coast Guard to safeguard national sovereignty, security and maritime rights and interests.
China exercises sovereignty and jurisdiction over relevant waters in accordance with law. Even the deployment of law-enforcement forces or necessary defensive capabilities in relevant areas by no means freedom of navigation in the South China Sea would be affected, said Chen.
He argued that the South China Sea remains one of the world's busiest international shipping routes, and normal commercial navigation has never been obstructed by China. What the Philippines calls "freedom of navigation" appears to conflate commercial navigation with its demand that Philippine fishing vessels, coast guard ships, government vessels and even warships be allowed unrestricted access to waters around China's Huangyan Dao.
Last month, the Philippine side organized seven public vessels, three coast guard ships and one fish transport ship, and egged on a large number of fishing boats to illegally assemble in the waters under China's jurisdiction at Huangyan Dao, Jiang Lue, spokesperson for the China Coast Guard (CCG) said.
During this period, three Philippine public vessels - MMOV 3001, MMOV 3005 and MMOV 3017 - ignored repeated dissuasion and warnings from the CCG and obstinately intruded into the territorial waters of China's Huangyan Dao, Jiang added.
The CCG took necessary countermeasures in accordance with the law against the Philippine rights-violation vessels, including verbal warnings, blocking, and shooting water cannons, to resolutely expel them.
The Global Times learned that the Philippines harbored clear provocative intentions in this aggressive intrusion. Its vessel MMOV 3001 repeatedly charged at high speed into the 12-nautical-mile territorial waters surrounding China's Huangyan Dao. On-site footage obtained by the Global Times also shows this Philippine vessel was fitted with anti-collision padding, prepped for anticipated vessel collisions.
Also last month, Chinese foreign ministry firmly rejected and said it will never accept the delimitation of the so-called "baselines of the territorial sea" of China's territory of Huangyan Dao by the Philippines, stressing it is illegal, null and void. 
The statement came after the Philippines claimed it has deposited its official nautical chart of Huangyan Dao and its surrounding maritime zones with the United Nations Secretariat. 
With regard to the Philippines' illegal and false claims, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in the Friday's statement that Huangyan Dao is China's inherent territory. China has indisputable sovereignty over it and its adjacent waters, and has sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the relevant waters. China has continuously, peacefully and effectively exercised sovereignty and jurisdiction over Huangyan Dao. The territory of the Philippines has been defined by a series of international treaties, and Huangyan Dao has never been a part of it. The Philippines' illegal territorial claim over China's Huangyan Dao is completely baseless under international law, according to the ministry.
Chen said that in fact, it is increasingly clear who is fueling militarization in the South China Sea. The Philippines has continued to strengthen their military presence and activities in the region in recent years. Manila's attempt to smear China's legitimate actions around Huangyan Dao as a threat to freedom of navigation is essentially a political narrative rather than a reflection of the actual state of navigation in the South China Sea.
。    
China and India held the 25th round of talks between the two countries' special representatives on the boundary question in Beijing on August 25, 2026. Photo: Chinese Foreign Ministry
    China and India held the 25th round of talks between the two countries' special representatives on the boundary question in Beijing on August 25, 2026. Photo: Chinese Foreign Ministry
China and India held the 25th round of talks between the two countries' special representatives on the boundary question in Beijing on Tuesday, during which the two sides had comprehensive, in-depth, friendly and candid communication on the China-India boundary question and bilateral relations, according to the Xinhua News Agency. 
The two sides are orderly implementing the consensus reached at the Special Representatives' meetings. Institutional exchanges and cooperation between the two countries are resuming, with both sides committed to maintaining peace and tranquility in border areas, Wang Yi, a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, director of the Office of the Central Commission for Foreign Affairs and China's Special Representative on the Boundary Question between China and India, said at the meeting, Xinhua said. 
The two sides should learn from history, place the boundary question in its proper position within bilateral relations, and continue moving forward without stagnation, regression or deviation from the right course. They should build a positive narrative on China-India border affairs, making dialogue, peace, consultation and cooperation the mainstream, and inject positive factors into the healthy and stable development of bilateral relations, Wang noted, per Xinhua. 
Also on Tuesday, Chinese Vice President Han Zheng met with Ajit Doval, India's National Security Advisor and Special Representative on the China-India boundary question, in Beijing. 
China and India should view and handle bilateral relations from a strategic and long-term perspective, and work together to implement the important consensus reached by their leaders, Han said, per Xinhua.
The two sides should enhance strategic mutual trust, tap the potential for cooperation, maintain close multilateral coordination, properly manage differences, and promote the sustained and stable development of China-India relations, he said.
As the world's two most populous and fastest-growing major economies, India and China have a historic opportunity for cooperation, Doval said, adding that India stands ready to work with China to deepen mutually beneficial cooperation, properly address the boundary question and make new progress in bilateral relations.
The role of talks between the special representatives on the boundary question has expanded beyond boundary negotiations. While initially focused on resolving the boundary issue, the mechanism has evolved into an important platform for the two sides to exchange views on bilateral relations as well as major international and regional issues, helping enhance communication and strategic mutual trust, Qian Feng, director of the Research Department at Tsinghua University's National Strategy Institute, told the Global Times. 
Qian said China-India relations have been improving since the meeting between leaders of the two countries at the BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia, in 2024.
During the talks, Wang also said China is ready to work with India to approach bilateral relations from a strategic and long-term perspective, strengthen communication, enhance mutual understanding, resolve differences and overcome obstacles, so as to be good neighbors and friends, and partners that help each other succeed, and achieve "the dragon and elephant dancing together."
Resolving differences 
India's Economic Times said the talks also come at a time when differences over the border issue continue to figure prominently in India-China bilateral ties. 
While success eluded it in resolving the boundary dispute, officials on both sides regard the structured mechanism as a useful tool in addressing the recurring tensions between the two countries on various fronts, according to the Indian media. 
The boundary question between China and India is a complex historical issue that is difficult to resolve through just a few rounds of talks, Qian admitted.
As long as mechanisms such as the talks between the special representatives continue to function, it shows that both sides are willing to manage and resolve differences through consultation, Qian noted. 
During the latest round of talks on boundary question, Doval noted that under the guidance of the leaders of the two countries, China-India relations have returned to the right track, peace and tranquility have been generally maintained in the border areas, and exchanges and cooperation in various fields have steadily advanced, according to Xinhua.
India is ready to further strengthen strategic communication with China, expand mutually beneficial cooperation, deepen multilateral coordination, effectively manage the border areas, explore solutions to the boundary question, and promote the accelerated improvement and development of China-India relations, the Indian official said, Xinhua reported. 
On Tuesday, the two sides also held in-depth discussions on advancing boundary delimitation negotiations, strengthening border management and control, and promoting cross-border cooperation. They reaffirmed that, in accordance with the political guiding principles agreed upon in 2005 and in a spirit of mutual respect and understanding, they will utilize the special representatives' meeting mechanism to seek a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable package solution to the boundary question, according to Xinhua. 
The two sides will continue to properly handle the boundary question through dialogue and consultation and jointly safeguard peace and tranquility in the border areas. They agreed that 26th round of talks between the two countries' special representatives on the boundary question will be held in India in 2027, Xinhua said. 
The priority regarding the China-India boundary question for the next stage should be to ensure peace and stability in the border areas. The two sides should continue to make use of existing communication mechanisms and create a more favorable atmosphere for resolving the boundary question through consultation by maintaining stability along the border, Qian noted. 

Current article:http://f3v.michengyuraochixun.buzz/list_0uk6ciu/hhj.html

Published on:00:00:00


    文章推荐

    分类排行榜

    专栏文章

    更多>

    服务推荐